Out of all the clips I've seen, I have yet to actually see anything in the woman's hand...
Even is she did time travel from some point in the future {by the way I don't believe time travel is possible}, who do you think she would be talking to in 1928 and how would she have gotten reception signal???
Even is she did time travel from some point in the future {by the way I don't believe time travel is possible}, who do you think she would be talking to in 1928 and how would she have gotten reception signal???
The Paved Straight Road, Won't Always Get You Farther Than The Winding Dirt Road...
Can You Run Your Game??? Click Here And Find Out...
*Note, Not All Games Have Been Tested & Therefore May Not Be Listed...
Can You Run Your Game??? Click Here And Find Out...
*Note, Not All Games Have Been Tested & Therefore May Not Be Listed...
Sure time travel is possible, as a matter of fact, we're doing it right now. I do agree that there is nothing in the hand of that ladyman. I think that's someone partially "acting" and getting stage direction to stop being looking terrified on camera and for whatever reason decides to talk back to them blowing the shot . . . yet the used it anyway. Ah silent cinema at it's finest. If you look close enough the shadow reveals nothing in the hand.
This is one possibility (Although it doesn't explain why she is talking).
http://beckerexhibits.wustl.edu/did/20thcent/index.htm
http://beckerexhibits.wustl.edu/did/20thcent/index.htm