True, but in this special case it would have been better and more entertaing if they had made the second part only with one movie, not two, since the story isn't sufficient and interesting enough for this wohle length of more than four hours - in my humble opion, of course.Jerry Dan wrote:Not that there's anything wrong with making money by creating entertaining movies, right?
(Naturally I still don't really know how the third movie would be like, but the story of the second one could have been played in half of the time without any lengthy parts - and I guess that the third movie will continue in the same way.)