Page 3 of 3
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 24, 2010 • 4:42 pm
by Bafitis
mmmhhmmmm PI... Well PIE.... lol

Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 24, 2010 • 5:54 pm
by Bjyman
So PI as in fractions? That's how it was taught in school talking about pizzas.
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 2:49 am
by Fred Buer
I was referring to punch'n pie, actually, but close enough. And Private Eye. And of course Sam's favorite little decimaled number.
Actually I would love to see that. Coming home, punching in 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190914.....
-Fred
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 5:19 am
by Joel
Who do you think would win in a fight between Christian Bale and Mel Gibson? Find out for yourselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9ge02eybjY
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 7:02 am
by sam10100
Fred,
I think PI would be too obvious. I'd probably make you punch in the natural logarithm number instead since fewer people know that one.

Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 1:21 pm
by Fred Buer
What? 2,71? That's a boring number. Why not 1,61? It's golden!
-Fred
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 1:56 pm
by sam10100
Eh the golden ratio exists everywhere in nature. Pi's been done to death. I could always go for a science constants like the mass of an electron, the universal gravitational constant, or maybe Avogadro's Number.
Maybe I should just give you a math problem and make you show your work to the computer before you get entry. Haha.
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 6:20 pm
by Fred Buer
Or just zero zero zero zero, enter. Nobody would assume a NASA employee would have something so godawfully simplistic. It's foolproof!
-Fred
Re: Mel Gibson
Posted: July 25, 2010 • 6:41 pm
by Bafitis